Note
Go to the end to download the full example code. or to run this example in your browser via JupyterLite or Binder
Multiple Randomized Cross-Validation#
This tutorial introduces MultipleRandomizedCV,
which is based on the “Multiple Randomized Backtests” methodology of Palomar in [1].
This cross-validation strategy performs a Monte Carlo–style evaluation by repeatedly
sampling distinct asset subsets (without replacement) and contiguous time
windows, then applying an inner walk-forward split to each subsample, capturing both
temporal and cross-sectional variability in performance.
In this example, we build a portfolio model composed of a preselection of top
performers, followed by a Hierarchical Equal Risk Contribution optimization with
covariance shrinkage. We split the dataset into training and testing sets, tune
hyperparameters on the training set, and then evaluate the final portfolio models on
the test set using MultipleRandomizedCV.
Data Loading#
We load the FTSE 100 dataset, which contains daily prices of 64 assets from the FTSE 100 index, spanning 2000-01-04 to 2023-05-31.
import scipy.stats as stats
from plotly.io import show
from sklearn import set_config
from sklearn.model_selection import RandomizedSearchCV, train_test_split
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
from skfolio import Population, RatioMeasure, RiskMeasure
from skfolio.datasets import load_ftse100_dataset
from skfolio.metrics import make_scorer
from skfolio.model_selection import MultipleRandomizedCV, WalkForward, cross_val_predict
from skfolio.moments import ShrunkCovariance
from skfolio.optimization import HierarchicalEqualRiskContribution
from skfolio.pre_selection import SelectKExtremes
from skfolio.preprocessing import prices_to_returns
from skfolio.prior import EmpiricalPrior
set_config(transform_output="pandas")
prices = load_ftse100_dataset()
returns = prices_to_returns(prices)
# Sequential train-test split: 67% training, 33% testing.
# `shuffle=False` preserves chronological order, crucial for time-series data.
X_train, X_test = train_test_split(returns, test_size=0.33, shuffle=False)
Portfolio Construction#
We build a pipeline that first selects the top-k assets by Sharpe ratio, then allocates weights via Hierarchical Equal Risk Contribution using a shrunk covariance estimator.
pre_selection = SelectKExtremes(k=10, measure=RatioMeasure.SHARPE_RATIO, highest=True)
optimization = HierarchicalEqualRiskContribution(
prior_estimator=EmpiricalPrior(
covariance_estimator=ShrunkCovariance(shrinkage=0.5)
),
risk_measure=RiskMeasure.VARIANCE,
)
model_bench = Pipeline(
[
("pre_selection", pre_selection),
("optimization", optimization),
]
)
Rebalancing Strategy#
We use WalkForward to define a monthly rebalancing
(20 trading days), training on the prior year (252 trading days):
walk_forward = WalkForward(test_size=20, train_size=252)
Note that WalkForward also supports specific
datetime frequencies. For examples, we could use
walk_forward = WalkForward(test_size=1, train_size=12, freq="WOM-3FRI") to
rebalance monthly on the third Friday (WOM-3FRI), training on the prior 12
months.
Hyperparameter Tuning#
Initially, the number of selected assets and the shrinkage parameter were
chosen randomly. We use RandomizedSearchCV to explore these parameters and
find the combination that maximizes the mean out-of-sample CVaR ratio.
random_search = RandomizedSearchCV(
estimator=model_bench,
cv=walk_forward,
n_jobs=-1,
param_distributions={
"pre_selection__k": stats.randint(10, 30),
"optimization__prior_estimator__covariance_estimator__shrinkage": stats.uniform(
0, 1
),
},
n_iter=30,
random_state=0,
scoring=make_scorer(RatioMeasure.CVAR_RATIO),
)
random_search.fit(X_train)
# Retrieve the best estimator from the search.
model_tuned = random_search.best_estimator_
model_tuned
In practice, it’s recommended to increase n_iter to sample more parameter
combinations, then plot those samples to ensure adequate search-space coverage and
examine the convergence of training and test performance. (see the
L1 and L2 Regularization tutorial).
Standard Walk-Forward Analysis#
We evaluate both the benchmark and tuned models on the test set using standard walk-forward analysis, which yields a single backtest path per model. A single backtest path represents one possible trajectory of cumulative returns under the given rebalancing scheme and parameter set. While easy to compute, it may understate the variability and uncertainty of real-world performance compared to Monte Carlo-based methods.
pred_bench = cross_val_predict(model_bench, X_test, cv=walk_forward)
pred_bench.name = "Benchmark Model"
pred_tuned = cross_val_predict(model_tuned, X_test, cv=walk_forward, n_jobs=-1)
pred_tuned.name = "Tuned Model"
# Combine results for easier analysis.
population = Population([pred_bench, pred_tuned])
population.plot_cumulative_returns()
Display a summary of key performance metrics.
population.summary()
Multiple Randomized Cross-Validation#
We perform Monte Carlo-style resampling by drawing 500 subsamples of 50 distinct assets and contiguous 3-year windows (3 x 252 trading days), then applying our walk-forward split to each subsample. This approach captures both temporal and cross-sectional variability.
cv_mc = MultipleRandomizedCV(
walk_forward=walk_forward,
n_subsamples=500,
asset_subset_size=50,
window_size=3 * 252,
random_state=0,
)
# Generate cross-validated predictions for both models.
pred_bench_mc = cross_val_predict(
model_bench,
X_test,
cv=cv_mc,
n_jobs=-1,
portfolio_params={"tag": "Benchmark Model"},
)
pred_tuned_mc = cross_val_predict(
model_tuned, X_test, cv=cv_mc, n_jobs=-1, portfolio_params={"tag": "Tuned Model"}
)
# Combine results for easier analysis.
population_mc = pred_bench_mc + pred_tuned_mc
Visualization and Analysis#
We plot cumulative returns for the first 10 MultiPeriodPortfolio (Monte Carlo paths)
of the tuned model. Each MultiPeriodPortfolio concatenates the test (out-of-sample)
results from the walk-forward.
fig = pred_tuned_mc[:10].plot_cumulative_returns(use_tag_in_legend=False)
show(fig)
We now compute and display the distribution of out-of-sample annualized Sharpe ratios:
population_mc.plot_distribution(
measure_list=[RatioMeasure.ANNUALIZED_SHARPE_RATIO],
tag_list=["Benchmark Model", "Tuned Model"],
)
for pred in [pred_bench_mc, pred_tuned_mc]:
tag = pred[0].tag
mean_sr = pred.measures_mean(measure=RatioMeasure.ANNUALIZED_SHARPE_RATIO)
std_sr = pred.measures_std(measure=RatioMeasure.ANNUALIZED_SHARPE_RATIO)
print(f"{tag}\n{'=' * len(tag)}")
print(f"Average Sharpe Ratio: {mean_sr:0.2f}")
print(f"Sharpe Ratio Std Dev: {std_sr:0.2f}\n")
Benchmark Model
===============
Average Sharpe Ratio: 0.34
Sharpe Ratio Std Dev: 0.36
Tuned Model
===========
Average Sharpe Ratio: 0.53
Sharpe Ratio Std Dev: 0.34
We plot the asset composition for the first two MultiPeriodPortfolio:
pred_tuned_mc[:2].plot_composition(display_sub_ptf_name=False)
We plot the weights evolution over time for the first MultiPeriodPortfolio:
pred_tuned_mc[0].plot_weights_per_observation()
Conclusion#
A single-path walk-forward analysis may understate the variability and uncertainty of real-world performance. Multiple Randomized Cross-Validation, by contrast, applies Monte Carlo sampling across asset subsets and time windows, yielding performance estimates that are more robust and less prone to overfitting.
References#
Total running time of the script: (5 minutes 8.366 seconds)
